Legal Opinion

DeNardo v. Johnstone

District Court, D. Alaska

Decided September 6, 1991No. A90-0101 CivPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

SINGLETON, District Judge.

Daniel DeNardo (“DeNardo”) sued Patrick Murphy and the Alaska Public Employees Association (“APEA”). DeNardo charged that Murphy and APEA fraudulently caused DeNardo to lose his employment with the State of Alaska and contended that Murphy’s and the APEA’s reckless and intentional conduct deprived DeNardo of his job, which DeNardo contends is property, in violation of the Fourteenth Amendment. DeNardo predicated his claim on 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This court has jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1343. [See Docket No. 18] This court granted Murphy and the APEA…

2Cases cited25 opinions

Hughes v. RoweSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
Christiansburg Garment Co. v. Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
Kerr v. Screen Extras Guild, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
University of Tennessee v. ElliottSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
Franklin L. Miller v. Los Angeles County Board of Education and Stuart E. Gothold, Los Angeles County Superintendent of SchoolsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

Tracy v. State, Department of Health & Social Services, Office of Children ServicesAlaska Supreme Court · 2012