Legal Opinion
Franklin L. Miller v. Los Angeles County Board of Education and Stuart E. Gothold, Los Angeles County Superintendent of Schools
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided September 9, 1987No. 86-5791PublishedCited by 137 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CHOY, Senior Circuit Judge:
Franklin L. Miller appeals pro se the district court’s order granting a motion for attorney’s fees submitted by the Office of the Los Angeles County Superintendent of Schools 1 and Stuart E. Gothold (collective ly, the “Superintendent”) following a successful defense of Miller’s lawsuit. Miller also seeks reversal of a pretrial order denying sanctions against the Superintendent. We vacate and remand the district court’s award of attorney’s fees; we dismiss as untimely the appeal of the district court’s pretrial order denying sanctions.
BACKGROUND
Miller brought suit…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Blum v. StensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Hughes v. RoweSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Christiansburg Garment Co. v. Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Pennsylvania v. Delaware Valley Citizens' Council for Clean AirSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by137 opinions
- Sanchez v. City of Santa AnaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Rufus E. Cunningham v. County of Los Angeles, and Richard Eiden, Real-Party-In-Interest-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- Hyland v. WonderCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- Ronald Wolfe, Jr. v. Allan PerryCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005
- Roth v. GreenCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006
132 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.