Legal Opinion

Reed v. Russell

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided June 27, 1946No. 7280PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GIVENS, Justice.

Steve Russell, respondent-employer, owns and operates a sawmill approximately five miles northeast of Weippe towards Pierce, and a quarter of a mile or so north of his mill a farm where he keeps livestock consisting of cattle, horses and mules — the latter used to pack camping and hunting parties into the adjacent mountains and game areas, and the mules also in skidding logs.

James R. Reed, deceased, was first employed by Russell to work at the mill and later — prior to the fatal accident — ostensibly relegated to agricultural employment on a $200-a-month-wage basis. Russell…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Manion Ex Rel. Manion v. WaybrightIdaho Supreme Court · 1938
  2. Feuling v. Farmers' Co-Operative Ditch Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1934
  3. Dorrell v. Norida Land & Timber Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1933
  4. Watkins v. CavanaghIdaho Supreme Court · 1940
  5. Nistad v. Winton Lumber Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1938

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Goodson v. LW Hult Produce CompanyIdaho Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Hubble v. PerraultIdaho Supreme Court · 1956
  3. Langley ex rel. Hillenbrand v. Consolidated Freightways, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1958
  4. Bartlett v. DarrahIdaho Supreme Court · 1955
  5. Wyoming State Treasurer v. GimlinWyoming Supreme Court · 1965

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API