Legal Opinion

State v. Copeland

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided October 16, 1984No. 13668PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PREWITT, Chief Judge.

Defendant is charged with driving a motor vehicle while intoxicated. The state appeals from the trial court’s order sustaining defendant’s motion to suppress. See § 547.200, RSMo Supp.1983. At issue is whether the police’s seizure without a warrant of a sample of defendant’s blood from a hospital was improper under the fourth amendment to the United States Constitution and article I, § 15 of the Missouri Constitution.

A vehicular collision was reported to the Joplin Police Department at approximately 1:30 a.m. on Thursday, January 27, 1983. The traffic officer sent to…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. State v. McCrarySupreme Court of Missouri · 1981
  2. Commonwealth v. SiloSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  3. State v. DyalSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1984
  4. Morris v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1967
  5. State v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1975

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. People v. PerlosMichigan Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Thurman v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1993
  3. State v. SetterMissouri Court of Appeals · 1986
  4. State v. LeRetteMissouri Court of Appeals · 1993
  5. State of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent v. Theresa FortnerMissouri Court of Appeals · 2014

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API