Legal Opinion

State v. Dyal

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided July 31, 1984PublishedCited by 74 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

POLLOCK, J.

The main issue on this appeal is whether the patient-physician privilege created by N.J.S.A. 2A:84A-22.2 precludes admission of results of a blood test into evidence in the prosecution of a death-by-auto case. A second issue is whether the prosecutor’s reference during summation to a .10% blood alcohol reading as the “legal threshold” constitutes reversible error.

In this case, a hospital employee took a blood sample for medical diagnosis, not for police investigative purposes. The employee told the defendant, who had operated a motor vehicle…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Chimel v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. United States v. RossSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. State v. MacOnSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1971
  5. Kelly v. GwinnellSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1984

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by74 opinions

  1. People v. PerlosMichigan Supreme Court · 1990
  2. State v. SzempleSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1994
  3. Stempler v. SpeidellSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1985
  4. State v. WidmaierSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1999
  5. State v. WrightSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1987

69 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API