Legal Opinion

Simonsen v. BTH PROPERTIES

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided August 18, 1987No. C2-87-489PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

A. PAUL LOMMEN, Acting Judge.

Respondents brought an action against appellants, claiming appellants were in default on a contract for deed entered into on or about November 16, 1981, with respect to rental property situated in Hennepin County. Respondents sought a foreclosure of said property and/or a money judgment. Appellants counterclaimed and contended that they were induced to enter into the contract for deed for said property by false representations from the respondents with respect to the number of available rental units in the property.

Respondents moved for and were granted…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Leif M. Hanson v. Ford Motor Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1960
  2. Klein v. First Edina National BankSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1972
  3. Davis v. Re-Trac Manufacturing CorporationSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1967
  4. Richfield Bank & Trust Co. v. SjogrenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
  5. Swanson v. DomningSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1957

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Hoyt Properties, Inc. v. Production Resource Group, L.L.C.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2006
  2. Lakeland Tool and Engineering, Inc. v. Thermo-Serv, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1990
  3. Kellogg Square Partnership, a Minnesota Partnership, Debtor-In-Possession v. The Prudential Insurance Company of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1995
  4. Midway National Bank of St. Paul v. BollmeierSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1991
  5. First State Bank of Floodwood v. JubieDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1993

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API