Legal Opinion

Guraly v. TENTA

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided March 6, 1956No. 18,669PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKelley, J.

This appeal involves questions of law only and they derive their virility from appellant’s contention that the conclusions of law stated by the court are erroneous.

The evidence is not brought into the record but the special findings of fact are acknowledged by appellant as “uncontroverted facts in this case.” In the special finding of facts the court found in substance:

That the decedent, Theresa B. Manyok, owned a certain farm located in Jasper and Porter counties and described in the findings; that said decedent could neither read nor write the English language and that the appellee^, Tenta…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Ikerd v. BeaversIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  2. McAdams v. BaileyIndiana Supreme Court · 1907
  3. Ames v. AmesIndiana Court of Appeals · 1910
  4. Bailin v. BailinIndiana Supreme Court · 1944
  5. Marion Trucking, Inc. v. Harwood Trucking, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1954

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Hutter v. WeissIndiana Court of Appeals · 1961
  2. Lewandowski v. BeverlyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1981
  3. Kramer v. RagerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1982
  4. Tenta v. GuralyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1966
  5. Massey v. St. Joseph Bank and Trust Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1980

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API