State v. T.O.

VANDE WALLE, Chief Justice.

[¶ 1] T.O. appealed from the district court’s order denying his petition for discharge from commitment as a sexually dangerous individual. The district court concluded T.O. remains a sexually dangerous individual. On appeal, T.O. argues the State did not prove by clear and convincing evidence that he is likely to engage in further acts of sexually predatory conduct. The district court’s order was supported by clear and convincing evidence and we affirm.

I

[¶ 2] In 2005, T.O. was civilly committed as a sexually dangerous individual. T.O. had been convicted of gross…