Legal Opinion
Grosinger v. M.D.
North Dakota Supreme Court
Decided November 19, 2008No. 20080082PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SANDSTROM, Justice.
[¶ 1] M.D. appeals a district court order denying his petition for discharge from commitment as a sexually dangerous individual. We affirm.
I
[¶ 2] In 1998, M.D. was civilly committed as a sexually dangerous individual, and this Court affirmed the district court’s commitment order. Interest of M.D., 1999 ND 160, 598 N.W.2d 799.
[¶ 3] For the first time since his commitment, M.D. petitioned for discharge in 2007 under N.D.C.C. § 25-03.3-18(1); a discharge hearing was held in March 2008. The district court appointed Dr. Robert G. Riedel as M.D.’s independent expert evaluator. On…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Kansas v. CraneSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Van Grinsven v. G.R.H.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
- In the Interest of M.D.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
- In the Matter of HehnNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
- Cass County State's Attorney v. E.W.F.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Enget v. J.T.N.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
- Feland v. A.M.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2009
- Pember v. ShapiroNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
- In Re VantreeceNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009
- Grosinger v. M.D.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2012
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.