Legal Opinion
In re the Fee Agreement of Stanley
United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims
Decided February 25, 1997No. 96-0017PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
NEBEKER, Chief Judge:
James W. Stanley, Jr., Esq., appeals an October 24, 1995, decision of the Board of Veterans’ Appeals (BVA or Board) which found him not entitled to attorney fees from past-due benefits awarded to the veteran, Clyde E. Page, for services rendered before the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) and the Board. Upon consideration of the parties’ briefs and the record on appeal, the Court will affirm the Board’s decision for the following reasons.
I. FACTS
The veteran served on active duty from January 1969 to January 1971, and for two-week periods of active duty for training in…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Gilbert v. DerwinskiUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1990
- Brown v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Pauley v. BethEnergy Mines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Walters v. National Assn. of Radiation SurvivorsSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Scates v. GoberUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 2000
- In re Fee Agreement of MasonUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1999
- In re the Fee Agreement of SmithUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1997
- Boyer v. WestUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1998
- In re Fee Agreement of CarpenterUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 2000
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.