Legal Opinion

Donaldson, Assignee v. Farwell

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided March 18, 1877No. 172PublishedCited by 66 opinions

1Opinion of the Court 1

93 U.S. 631

23 L.Ed. 993

DONALDSON, ASSIGNEE,

v.

FARWELL ET AL.

October Term, 1876

ERROR to he Circuit Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Wisconsin.

Emanuel Mann, a merchant doing business at Richfield, a small village on the St. Paul Railway, filed, May 24, 1872, his petition, in the District Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Wisconsin, to be declared a bankrupt. He was duly adjudged a bankrupt the sixth day of June then next ensuing, and the plaintiff was, on the first day of the following July, appointed his assignee.

In the month of April of that year the…

Also in this document: Opinion of the Court · Davis.

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Donaldson v. FarwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  2. Lupin v. MarieCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1830
  3. Bank of Leavenworth v. HuntSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
  4. M'Kinney v. ReaderSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1837
  5. Byrd v. HallNew York Court of Appeals · 1866

3Cited by66 opinions

  1. In Re Amjad I. Eashai, Debtor. Citibank (South Dakota), N.A. v. Amjad I. EashaiCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
  2. Stewart v. PlattSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
  3. Yeatman v. Savings InstitutionSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  4. Employer's Liability Assurance Corporation v. LuntArizona Supreme Court · 1957
  5. In re GarcewichCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1902

61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API