Legal Opinion

Brown v. Litynski

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided June 28, 1988No. C4-88-1038Published

1Opinion of the Court

SPECIAL TERM OPINION

WOZNIAK, Chief Judge.

FACTS

Brown seeks a writ of habeas corpus from this court, claiming a condition of his probation for a misdemeanor assault conviction was unconstitutional. He has not first petitioned for relief in the district court because respondent Judge Litynski is the judge sitting in Nicollet County, and Brown claims such a petition would be futile. Judge Litynski had ordered him to stay away from the home of the assault victim, also the mother of two of his children, as a condition of probation. Brown admitted visiting the residence on March 30 (the day of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Cybyske v. Independent School District No. 196, Rosemount-Apple ValleySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
  2. Wojahn v. HalterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1949
  3. State v. FribergCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1988
  4. State Ex Rel. O'Neill v. RiggSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1959
  5. State Ex Rel. Alexander v. RiggSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1956

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API