Legal Opinion

State v. Friberg

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided May 18, 1988No. C5-87-1703PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*377OPINION

SEDGWICK, Judge.

This appeal is from an order and judgment denying the appellants’ motion for an order dismissing misdemeanor trespass charges. Appellants contend their constitutional right to a speedy trial was denied and that probation restrictions on their picketing activities unconstitutionally infringe on their first amendment rights. We affirm.

FACTS

On December 23, 1986, approximately thirty-five individuals were protesting and picketing in front of the Planned Parenthood Clinic in St. Paul. Appellants staged a “sit-in” inside the clinic facilities and were arrested and charged…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Moore v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. United States v. Virginia Consuelo-GonzalezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
  4. State v. JonesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
  5. United States v. LoweCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. FribergSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
  2. State v. SahrNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1991
  3. People v. PickensAppellate Court of Illinois · 1989
  4. STATE OF MINN., CITY OF LITTLE CANADA v. RachieCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1988
  5. State v. HaynesCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1988

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API