Seville v. Holland America Line Westours, Inc.
Alaska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BRYNER, Justice.
I. INTRODUCTION
As Janet A. Seville left work, she slipped and injured herself on an icy public sidewalk outside the building occupied by her employ er, Holland America Line Westours, Inc. (Holland America). Seville sought workers’ compensation benefits, but the Alaska Workers’ Compensation Board denied her claim, concluding that the sidewalk was neither part of Holland America’s premises nor a “special hazard” of her employment. We reverse, concluding that, because the Anchorage Municipal Code required Holland America to keep the sidewalk free of ice, Seville’s injury…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Cudahy Packing Co. Of Nebraska v. ParramoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Bountiful Brick Co. v. GilesSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
- Handley v. State, Department of RevenueAlaska Supreme Court · 1992
- Madison v. Alaska Department of Fish & GameAlaska Supreme Court · 1985
- General Insurance Co. of America v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Holderness v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 2001
- Junior Antenor, Keilan C. Ebli, and Loren J. Larson Jr. v. State of Alaska, Department of CorrectionsAlaska Supreme Court · 2020
- Estate of Milos v. Quality Asphalt Paving, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2006
- Municipality of Anchorage v. RobertsonAlaska Supreme Court · 2001
- Warnke v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 2025