Klerlein v. Fred Werner Co., Inc.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Keller, J.,
The learned court below in entering judgment for the defendant non obstante veredicto inadvertently fell into error as respects certain facts, which may have affected its action.(1) The plaintiff did not ask for an accounting, or claim commissions due him in this action, from May, 1920, to April 30, 1925, as stated by the court, but only from July 1, 1924, to April 30, 1925. In his statement of claim he expressly limited his demand to commissions earned since July 1, 1924.(2) The meeting of stockholders of the defendant company at which it was unanimously resolved that…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Hill v. EpleySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1858
- Tustin v. Philadelphia & Reading Coal & Iron Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1915
- Duggan v. Duggan.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
- McGinn v. BennerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1897
- Tully v. FeltonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1896
3Cited by6 opinions
- Action Industries, Inc. v. WiedemanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
- GAF CORPORATION v. Amchem Products, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1975
- Berliner v. Bee Em Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
- Wilson & Gardner Co. v. WilsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
- Gehret v. Mitten Bank Securities Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.