Legal Opinion
Baranowski v. Hart
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided May 7, 2007No. 05-20646PublishedCited by 276 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PRADO, Circuit Judge:
In this appeal, a Texas prisoner contends that the defendants-appellees violated his rights under the First Amendment, the Fourteenth Amendment, and the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act, 42 U.S.C. § 2000ec-l et seq., by failing to provide weekly Sabbath and other holy day services, by failing to allow Jewish prisoners to use the chapel for their religious services, and by failing to provide him with a kosher diet. He also alleges that he was improperly denied appointment of counsel, an evidentiary hearing, and his right to a jury trial. For the reasons…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Paul W. Douglass v. United Services Automobile AssociationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1996
- Turner v. SafleySupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Cruz v. BetoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Employment Div., Dept. of Human Resources of Ore. v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- O'Lone v. Estate of ShabazzSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by276 opinions
- Sossamon v. Lone Star State of TexasCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2009
- Abdulhaseeb v. CalboneCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2010
- Washington v. KlemCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2007
- Anson McFaul v. Daniel ValenzuelaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2012
- Kemp v. LiebelCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2017
271 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.