United States Ex Rel. Rodriquez v. Weekly Publications, Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
LEIBELL, District Judge.
This is a “qui tam” action to which Secs. 231 and 232 of Title 31 U.S.C.A. apply. It seeks to charge the defendants with damages, in the nature of a penalty, for falsely and fraudulently presenting for allowance and approval claims against the United States knowing such claims to be false and fraudulent. It is alleged that defendants tendered a magazine to the Postmaster for mailing at second class rates, when that class mailing privilege had been lost through the failure of the defendant corporation to retain, out of its agency subscription contracts, at least 30%…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- United States Ex Rel. Marcus v. HessSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Deckert v. Independence Shares Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
- United States Ex Rel. Rodriguez v. Weekly Publications, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1944
- Thierfeld v. Postman's Fifth Avenue CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1941
- Sherr v. Anaconda Wire & Cable Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1945
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Erickson Ex Rel. United States v. American Institute of Biological SciencesDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1989
- in Re Xerox Corporation and Xerox State Healthcare, LLC F/K/A Acs State Healthcare, LlcTexas Supreme Court · 2018
- United States of America, Ex Rel. Jason R. Madden v. General Dynamics Corporation, a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
- Montecatini Edison, S.P.A. (A Corporation of Italy) v. Karl Ziegler, and E. I. Dupont De Nemours and Company (A Corporation of Delaware)Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1973
- United States Ex Rel. Mikes v. StrausDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1996
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.