Legal Opinion
Karp v. Speizer
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided June 15, 1982No. 1 CA-CIV 5365PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FROEB, Judge.
The question presented by this appeal is whether an assignment of proceeds expected to be recovered from a personal injury action is enforceable. The facts are as follows:
On March 27, 1975, Seymour and Shirley Karp obtained a judgment in the amount of $6,248.85 against Donald and Virginia Speizer. Thereafter, a written agreement was entered into with the Karps whereby Donald Speizer assigned “so much of the proceeds which may become due me as a result of my accident on December 9, 1974, at the corner of 44th Street and Camelback Road, Phoenix, Arizona, for the payment of…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Marks v. Hardware Dealers Mutual Fire Insurance Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1967
- Harleysville Mutual Insurance Company v. LeaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1966
- Davenport v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceNevada Supreme Court · 1965
- Allstate Insurance v. DrukeArizona Supreme Court · 1978
- Harvey v. ClemanWashington Supreme Court · 1965
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Hernandez v. Suburban Hospital Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1990
- Achrem v. Expressway Plaza Ltd. PartnershipNevada Supreme Court · 1996
- Midtown Chiropractic v. Illinois Farmers Insurance Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 2006
- Botma v. HuserCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2002
- Quality Chiropractic, PC v. Farmers InsuranceNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2002
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.