Legal Opinion

Title Insurance & Trust Co. v. California Development Co.

California Supreme Court

Decided October 9, 1915No. L. A. No. 3801PublishedCited by 10 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtSloss, J.

This is an appeal by Boaz Duncan, intervener, from that portion of the decree in the above-entitled cause which gives to the holders of receiver’s certificates priority over the bonded indebtedness secured by the deed of trust sought to be foreclosed. The general facts of the case and the purport of the decree are shown in the opinion filed by us in Title Insurance & Trust Co. v. California Development Co., (L. A. 3848), ante, p. 173, [152 Pac. 542],

The action was originally begun in the superior court of Imperial County, where the complaint was filed on December 13, 1909. On the same day the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Wallace v. LoomisSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  2. Title Insurance & Trust Co. v. California Development Co.California Supreme Court · 1915
  3. Title Ins. Trust Co. v. Calif. Etc. Co.California Supreme Court · 1911
  4. Title Etc. Trust Co. v. California Dev. Co.California Supreme Court · 1912

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Clifford v. West Hartford Creamery Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1931
  2. Tennant v. WildeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
  3. Weygandt v. LarsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
  4. Sinopoulo v. PortmanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1943
  5. Turner v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API