Sinopoulo v. Portman
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the CourtOsborn, J.
The appeal in the instant case is prosecuted by John Sino-poulo, Peter Sinopoulo, James S. Twy-ford, and Solon W. Smith, hereinafter referred to as appellants, from an order of the district court of Oklahoma county charging certain mineral interests of said appellants with a proportionate part of the expenses assumed and incurred in a receivership proceeding wherein the receiver, under the direction of the court, had completed the drilling of an oil well to production upon the property in which the appellants held said mineral interests.
The action was instituted on July 13, 1938, by Leo J.…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Atlantic Trust Co. v. ChapmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Wallace v. LoomisSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Jerome v. McCarterSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Hanna v. State Trust Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1895
- Raht v. . AttrillNew York Court of Appeals · 1887
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- National Surety Corp. v. SharpeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
- Miller Ex Rel. Continental Mortgage Investors v. Leadership Housing Systems, Inc.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1976
- State Ex Rel. Davis v. Iman Mining Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1958
- Deep Rock Oil Corp. v. BilbySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1947
- Ina Life Insurance Co. v. Brandywine Associates, Ltd.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1990
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.