Legal Opinion

Murphy v. Campbell Soup Co.

District Court, D. Massachusetts

Decided October 15, 1930No. 4413PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MORTON, District Judge.

These are motions by the plaintiff that the court amend the deputy marshal’s return of service on the writ, and by the defendant that the action be dismissed, because no sufficient service is shown by the return.

In the writ the defendant is described as “The Campbell Soup Co., a Corporation duly-established under the laws of the State'of New Jersey and doing business in the Commonwealth of Massachusetts through and by its Agent and Officer, Harry S. Young, conducting a place of business at No. 150 Causeway Street in the City of Boston, upon whom service is to be made as…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. RiceSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
  2. Reynolds v. Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1916
  3. United States v. FreightsSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  4. United Drug Co. v. CordleyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1921
  5. Reynolds v. Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1917

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Lisa Homer v. Nathaniel Jones-BeyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2005
  2. Davis v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1951
  3. Jones-Bey, Nathaniel v. Homer, LisaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API