Legal Opinion

McCarthy v. Boston & Maine Railroad

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided June 2, 1942No. 3264PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPage, J.

I. (1) James E. Wilbur, employed by the defendant, identified entries made by him contemporaneously in a book of records, showing tests and inspections of the automatic signalling apparatus at Barberry Crossing from December 10 to 30, 1935. In the same book were entries made prior to December 10 by another inspector, who did not testify. These other entries were not identified. Wilbur testified, after refreshing his recollection, to the complete scope of every one of his entries. His entries were then received in evidence. The whole book went to the jury, but with instructions to “pay no…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Gaudette v. McLaughlinSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1937
  2. Lavigne v. NelsonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1941
  3. State v. SlocinskiSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1938
  4. Kingsbury v. Boston & Maine RailroadSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1919
  5. Paulette v. Boston & Maine RailroadSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1936

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Clarence Borel v. Fibreboard Paper Products Corporation, Nationalsurety Corporation, Intervenor-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1973
  2. Killeen v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1966
  3. Watkins v. HolmesSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1943
  4. Clarence Borel v. Fibreboard Paper Products Corporation, Nationalsurety Corporation, Intervenor-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API