Legal Opinion

MacDonnell v. Arnott

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided March 13, 1936No. 3130Published

1Opinion

On Rehearing

For former opinion, see 56 Nev. 346, 53 P. (2d) 625. L. D. Summerfield, for Appellant, Ross Burke Co.: Joseph P. Haller and Albert Hilliard, for Respondent:

OPINION

By the Court,

COLEMAN, J.:

We granted a rehearing to consider the contention that even if the lower court had no discretion in the *507matter of making the allowance to the family, the claim of Ross Burke Company for funeral charges should be paid.

Section 9702 N. C. L. reads: “Any allowance made by the court or judge in accordance with the provisions of this act shall be paid by the executor or administrator in preference to…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Sharon v. MinnockNevada Supreme Court · 1871
  2. Phelps v. PhelpsIllinois Supreme Court · 1874
  3. Webb v. StillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  4. Farmers & Merchants National Bank v. Eureka Land & Stock Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 1935
  5. Hunter v. DownsNevada Supreme Court · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API