Legal Opinion

In re Atrium Med. Corp.

District Court, D. New Hampshire

Decided November 14, 2017No. MDL Docket No. 16–md–2753–LMPublished

1Opinion of the Court

Landya McCafferty, United States District Judge *328Getinge AB, one of the three defendants in this multi-district litigation, moves pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(2) to dismiss all claims against it for lack of personal jurisdiction. See doc. no. 80. Plaintiffs object to the motion to dismiss and also move for discovery on the issue of personal jurisdiction. See doc. no. 95. Getinge AB objects to discovery.

Background

Plaintiffs bring claims in individual cases for injuries they allege were caused by hernia repair products made from C-Qur mesh. They further allege that the C-Qur…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Daimler AG v. BaumanSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
  3. Walden v. FioreSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
  4. New Hampshire v. MaineSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  5. Reed Elsevier, Inc. v. MuchnickSupreme Court of the United States · 2010

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API