Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

United States v. Naegele

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided January 4, 2007No. Criminal 05-0151 (PLF)PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

PAUL L. FRIEDMAN, District Judge.

This matter is before the Court on the motion [73] of non-party Jeffrey Sherman for a protective order and the motion [78] of the United States to compel Mr. Sherman to produce records in response to a subpoena. 1

I. BACKGROUND

Jeffrey Sherman is an attorney who represented defendant Timothy Naegele in connection with the preparation and filing of Naegele’s bankruptcy petition of March 29, 2000. See Def. Opp. at 1. Sherman was served with a subpoena for documents and trial testimony by the United States on May 23, 2006. To protect his client’s…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Upjohn Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. Mead Data Central, Inc. v. United States Department of the Air ForceCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1977
  3. Coastal States Gas Corporation v. Department of EnergyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1980
  4. United States v. United Shoe MacHinery CorporationDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1950
  5. In Re Sealed CaseCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1982

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Cause of Action Inst. v. U.S. Dep't of JusticeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
  2. Pub. Citizen, Inc. v. U.S. Dep't of Educ.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2019
  3. United States v. NaegeleDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2007
  4. United States v. WhiteDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2013
  5. In re HaynesUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Tennessee · 2017

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API