Legal Opinion

Globe & Rutgers Fire Insurance v. Hamilton

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided June 21, 1917No. 9,313PublishedCited by 10 opinions

From Putnam Circuit Court; James P. Hughes, Judge. Action by Fay S. Hamilton against the Globe and Rutgers Fire Insurance Company. From a judgment for plaintiff, the defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtFelt, J.

This is an action by appellee against appellant on a fire insurance policy. The complaint in one paragraph was answered by a general denial, and by a second paragraph of special answer, to which appellee filed a reply in two paragraphs. A trial by jury resulted in a general verdict for appellee in the sum of $100.

1. With the general verdict the jury returned answers to certain interrogatories. The court overruled appellant’s motion for judgment on the answers to the interrogatories, and for a new trial, and rendered judgment on the general verdict, from which appellant appealed and has…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Reed v. Insurance Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1877
  2. Ransdel v. MooreIndiana Supreme Court · 1899
  3. Chicago & Erie Railroad v. DiniusIndiana Supreme Court · 1913
  4. Glens Falls Insurance Co. v. MichaelIndiana Supreme Court · 1905
  5. Havens v. Home InsuranceIndiana Supreme Court · 1887

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Iowa Electric Co. v. Home InsuranceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1945
  2. Samuel E. Pentecost Construction Co. v. O'DonnellIndiana Court of Appeals · 1942
  3. Sindlinger v. Department of Financial InstitutionsIndiana Supreme Court · 1936
  4. National Mutual Insurance v. BalesIndiana Court of Appeals · 1923
  5. Indianapolis Heat & Light Co. v. FitzwaterIndiana Court of Appeals · 1918

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API