Legal Opinion

National Mutual Insurance v. Bales

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided June 5, 1923No. 11,615PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBatman, J.

Appellees Bales, Nichols and Wright instituted this action against appellant on a policy of insurance, covering an automobile, issued by the latter to appellee Bales, which contained the following provisions, among others: “Loss if any under this policy shall be payable to Nichols & Wright, Clinton, Indiana, as their interest may appear. * * * This entire policy, unless otherwise provided by agreement endorsed hereon or added hereto, shall be void * * * . if the interest of the assured be other than unconditional or sole ownership. * * * This company shall not be *305liable for loss caused * * *…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Pittsburgh, Fort Wayne, & Chicago Railway Co. v. RubyIndiana Supreme Court · 1871
  2. West v. National Casualty Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1916
  3. Field v. CampbellIndiana Supreme Court · 1904
  4. Western Insurance v. AshbyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1913
  5. Evansville & Terre Haute Railroad v. HoffmanIndiana Court of Appeals · 1917

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Ver Hulst v. HoffmanIndiana Court of Appeals · 1972
  2. McClure v. MillerIndiana Supreme Court · 1951
  3. Ohio Farmers Insurance Company v. Ezra LantaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1957
  4. City of Indianapolis D/B/A Citizens Gas & Coke Utility v. BatesIndiana Court of Appeals · 1965
  5. Mercer Casualty Co. v. KreamerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1937

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API