Legal Opinion

Dorsey v. Hadlock

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 30, 1844PublishedCited by 4 opinions

APPEAL from the Floyd Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtSullivan, J.

— This was a bill im chancery, filed by the plaintiff in error as the second indorsee of a promissory note, to recover a balance due upon it from Hadlock and Wood-worth the first indorsers. The bill states that on the 3d of April, 1837, Stephenson and Acheson made their promissory *114note for the sum of 1,480 dollars and 7 cents, payable six months after date to HadbcJc and Woodworth; that Hadlock and Woodworth indorsed it on the 29th of May, 1837, to Greenbury Dorsey, and the latter on the same day indorsed it to the complainant; that on the 9th of October, 1837, the note being unpaid, the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Riddle & Co. v. Mandeville & JamessonSupreme Court of the United States · 1809
  2. Hanna v. PeggIndiana Supreme Court · 1822
  3. President of the Bank of the United States v. WeisigerSupreme Court of the United States · 1829
  4. M'Carty v. RheaIndiana Supreme Court · 1820

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Roberts v. MastersIndiana Supreme Court · 1872
  2. Miller v. BeaverIndiana Supreme Court · 1868
  3. Thompson v. CampbellIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
  4. Clark v. SpearsIndiana Supreme Court · 1846

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API