Legal Opinion · Concurrence

James H. Sewell, Doing Business Under the Fictitious Firm Name and Style of Burns Cuboid Company v. Federal Trade Commission

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided October 16, 1956No. 14354_1Published

1ConcurrenceJames Alger Fee, Circuit Judge

In view of the fact that a dissent is to be filed, the following may add clarity to our determination.

The right of the people who buy shoes and have individual ideas in respect to comfort, poise, balance and posture is involved here. It is not a contest between a selfish seller and an administrative body. Insofar as purely scientific and medical claims are concerned, the Commission is fully supported by this Court. In such a field, where experimentation might be dangerous, perhaps the individual must be protected against himself. It is an extremely close question as to whether a situation…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Federal Trade Commission v. Curtis Publishing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1923
  2. Aronberg v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1942
  3. P. Lorillard Co. v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1950
  4. Gulf Oil Corporation v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1945
  5. Walling v. Mid-Continent Pipe Line Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1944

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API