Legal Opinion

Polskee v. Friedlander

Court of Appeals of Tennessee

Decided July 31, 1928PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHeiskell, J.

This is a suit for the conversion of a diamond ring. On November 26, 1926, the complainant, Polskee, sold the ring in question to one B. C. Whitehead on a conditional sale contract. The description was “One diamond ring No. 47, two sapphires and two diamonds on each side.” On the next day the ven-dee under the name of O. R. Whitehead, pawned the'ring with defendant Friedlander for $250. The complainant learned that defendant had the ring and demanded its return. This was refused on the ground that the description in the conditional sale contract did not fit this ring.

Complainant filed his…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Dougherty v. ChesnuttTennessee Supreme Court · 1887
  2. McGill v. Chilhowee Lumber Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1903

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Lance Productions, Inc. v. Commerce Union BankCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1988
  2. Theresa Caldwell v. Canada Trace, Inc.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API