Legal Opinion

Bartz v. Braun

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided October 31, 1961PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBroadfoot, J.

At the close of the plaintiffs’ testimony, the appellants moved for a nonsuit and the motion was denied by the trial court. It is contended upon appeal that this was error.

A motion for nonsuit presents a question of law for determination by the court and is equivalent to a demurrer to the evidence. In passing thereon the trial court should view the evidence in a light most favorable to the plaintiff and must give the plaintiff the benefit of the most-favorable inferences that can reasonably be deduced therefrom. Lake Mills v. Veldhuizen (1953), 263 Wis. 49, 56 N. W. (2d) 491.

At the time the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Laughnan v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1957
  2. Jennings v. Mueller Transportation Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1955
  3. City of Lake Mills v. VeldhuizenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1953

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Beaudoin v. Watertown Memorial HospitalWisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Maus v. CookWisconsin Supreme Court · 1961
  3. State Ex Rel. Skibinski v. TadychWisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
  4. Lee v. Milwaukee Gas Light Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
  5. Schoenfeldt v. BabcockWisconsin Supreme Court · 1965

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API