Bartz v. Braun
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtBroadfoot, J.
At the close of the plaintiffs’ testimony, the appellants moved for a nonsuit and the motion was denied by the trial court. It is contended upon appeal that this was error.
A motion for nonsuit presents a question of law for determination by the court and is equivalent to a demurrer to the evidence. In passing thereon the trial court should view the evidence in a light most favorable to the plaintiff and must give the plaintiff the benefit of the most-favorable inferences that can reasonably be deduced therefrom. Lake Mills v. Veldhuizen (1953), 263 Wis. 49, 56 N. W. (2d) 491.
At the time the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Laughnan v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1957
- Jennings v. Mueller Transportation Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1955
- City of Lake Mills v. VeldhuizenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1953
3Cited by7 opinions
- Beaudoin v. Watertown Memorial HospitalWisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
- Maus v. CookWisconsin Supreme Court · 1961
- State Ex Rel. Skibinski v. TadychWisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
- Lee v. Milwaukee Gas Light Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
- Schoenfeldt v. BabcockWisconsin Supreme Court · 1965
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.