Legal Opinion

People v. Blanco

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 4, 1992No. A054352PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

PETERSON, J. *

Appellant contends that the 1991 amendment to Evidence Code section 1103, subdivision (b)—which allows the introduction of evidence of a defendant’s violent acts and reputation for violence, if a defendant presents evidence as to the bad acts or reputation of the victim of a crime—violates the due process rights of a criminal defendant and is, therefore, unconstitutional. We reject this contention, find no reversible error, and affirm the judgment of conviction.

I. Facts and Procedural History

It is uncontested that appellant shot the murder victim in the back, shortly…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Dowling v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  3. People v. BensonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Hale v. MorganCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
  5. People v. RaleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. People v. FuiavaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2012
  2. People v. HalvorsenCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007
  3. People v. JohnsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
  4. Adonay Melendez v. Cheryl Pliler, Warden Attorney General of the State of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
  5. People v. Vega-RoblesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API