Legal Opinion

Jackson v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co.

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided May 12, 2011No. 10CA0369PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge DAILEY.

Plaintiff, Rebecca Jackson, appeals the trial court's judgment notwithstanding the verdict (JNOYV) in favor of defendant, American Family Mutual Insurance Company (American Family), on her breach of contract claim. We affirm.

I. Background

In March 2002, Jackson was seriously injured in a car accident. At the time, she was insured under an American Family automobile policy which provided basic personal injury protection (PIP) benefits. The policy did not, however, provide (as was then required by law) an option to purchase extended PIP coverage. See Colorado Auto Accident…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. American Pipe & Construction Co. v. UtahSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Crown, Cork & Seal Co. v. ParkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Amado Salazar-Calderon, Cross-Appellees v. Presidio Valley Farmers Association, CrossCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1985
  4. Argus Real Estate, Inc. v. E-470 Public Highway AuthoritySupreme Court of Colorado · 2005
  5. Rosenthal v. Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1995

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Loveland Essential Group, LLC v. Grommon Farms, Inc.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2012
  2. Top Rail Ranch Estates, LLC v. WalkerColorado Court of Appeals · 2014
  3. Neuromonitoring Associates v. Centura Health Corp.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2012
  4. Foster v. PlockColorado Court of Appeals · 2016
  5. Reistad v. BurmanColorado Court of Appeals · 2024

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API