Legal Opinion
Foster v. Plock
Colorado Court of Appeals
Decided March 10, 2016No. Court of Appeals No. 15CA0346Published
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by CHIEF JUDGE LOEB
*1011¶ 1 Plaintiff, Scott E. Foster, appeals the district court's judgment dismissing his action against defendant, John E. Plock, pursuant to C.R.C.P. 12(b)(5). Foster argues that the court erred in ruling that his claims were barred both by issue and claim preclusion.1 We conclude that the district court correctly dismissed Foster's case as barred by claim preclusion. Accordingly, we do not consider the parties' arguments regarding issue preclusion. We affirm the judgment and remand with directions.
I. Background and Procedural History
¶ 2 The origins of this case lie in…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Parklane Hosiery Co. v. ShoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Blonder-Tongue Laboratories, Inc. v. University of Illinois FoundationSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Bernhard v. Bank of America National Trust & Saving AssociationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Pomeroy v. WaitkusSupreme Court of Colorado · 1973
- Argus Real Estate, Inc. v. E-470 Public Highway AuthoritySupreme Court of Colorado · 2005
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.