Schammel v. Schammel
California Supreme Court
Appeal from orders of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco directing an execution to issue and refusing to vacate or modify it. The" facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Belcher, C.
The parties to this action were husband and wife, and were divorced by a decree entered therein on December 9,1887. The decree awarded to the plaintiff the custody of Etta Schammel, the minor child of the parties, and the defendant was “ ordered and decreed to contribute to the support and education of said Etta, the sum of fifteen dollars per month during the *260period of her minority,” and “to pay said sum of money to the plaintiff, or to her order, or to the legal guardian of said minor, on the first day of every month for the time aforesaid.”
On May 5, 1890, on motion of the…
2Cited by23 opinions
- Primm v. PrimmCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
- In Re Marriage of RosanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
- Wilson v. MitchellSupreme Court of Colorado · 1910
- Barry v. SparksMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1940
- In Re Marriage of KuppingerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.