Legal Opinion

Chapsky v. Wood

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided July 15, 1881PublishedCited by 103 opinions

Original Proceedings in Habeas Corpus. Petition for a writ of habeas corpus, filed in this court by Morris A. Chapsky, October 11, 1881. For the petitioner, counsel were Howell Jones, J. D. McFarland, John Martin, and J". D. 8. Cook. For the respondents, Joseph H. Wood and wife, counsel were George R. Peck and L. C. Slavens. The case was argued orally by Messrs. Martin, McFarland and Cook for the petitioner, and by Messrs. Peck and Slavens for the respondents.

Read the full summary

Original Proceedings in Habeas Corpus. Petition for a writ of habeas corpus, filed in this court by Morris A. Chapsky, October 11, 1881. For the petitioner, counsel were Howell Jones, J. D. McFarland, John Martin, and J". D. 8. Cook. For the respondents, Joseph H. Wood and wife, counsel were George R. Peck and L. C. Slavens. The case was argued orally by Messrs. Martin, McFarland and Cook for the petitioner, and by Messrs. Peck and Slavens for the respondents. November 4, 1881, the opinion herein was filed.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Brewer, J.:

In this case of the petition of Morris A. Chapsky for the possession of his minor child, counsel have in their arguments expressed very feelingly and truthfully the embarrassments' and difficulties which surround the decision of a case like this. • These arise, not because there is a conflicting question of fact to be settled by the court, for that is a matter of every-day occurrence in judicial proceedings; it is not that it is a question between a grown man on one side and a grown woman on the other, for .we could dispose of every question…

2Cited by103 opinions

  1. In Re Custody of HernandezSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  2. State Ex Rel. Wood v. DeatonTexas Supreme Court · 1900
  3. Ross v. HoffmanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1977
  4. Purinton v. JamrockMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1907
  5. In Re Petition for Adoption of J. S. R.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1977

98 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API