Legal Opinion

People v. Viniegra

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 13, 1982No. Crim. 22653PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

ELKINGTON, J.

Defendant Dolores Aboytes Viniegra was convicted on a jury’s verdicts of (count one) fraud in obtaining public aid in violation of Welfare and Institutions Code section 11483, (count two) perjury in violation of Penal Code section 118, and (count three) fraudulent acquisition of federal food stamps in violation of Penal Code section 396. She was thereafter placed upon conditional probation.

Her appeal from the “judgment” was obviously intended to be from the order granting probation. (See Pen. Code, § 1237, subd. 1.) We so consider it.

No contention is made that the evidence…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. People v. WatsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  2. People v. RochaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  3. People v. WilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  4. People v. PrestonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
  5. People v. StewartCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. People v. PanahCalifornia Supreme Court · 2005
  2. People v. MaloneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
  3. People v. HagenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Hernandez v. PaiciusCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
  5. Milton Rosales Rivera v. Loretta E. LynchCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API