Legal Opinion

Heider v. Glasstech, Inc., Unpublished Decision (7-16-1999)

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided July 16, 1999No. 97 CV 038. Court of Appeals No. WD-98-052Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND JUDGMENT ENTRY This is an appeal from a judgment of the Wood County Court of Common Pleas which granted summary judgment to appellees, Glasstech, Inc. ("Glasstech") and Mark D. Christman ("Christman"), in this employment contract dispute. For the reasons stated herein, this court affirms the judgment of the trial court.

Appellant, James E. Heider, sets forth the following eleven assignments of error:

"STATEMENTS OF ASSIGNMENTS OF ERROR PRESENTED FOR REVIEW
"FIRST ASSIGNMENT OF ERROR
"THE TRIAL COURT DISREGARDED OHIO LAW WHEN IT GRANTED APPELLEES' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT ON MR.…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Blakemore v. BlakemoreOhio Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Lorain National Bank v. Saratoga ApartmentsOhio Court of Appeals · 1989
  3. Mers v. Dispatch Printing Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1985
  4. O'Brien v. AngleyOhio Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Cohen & Co. v. MessinaOhio Court of Appeals · 1985

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API