Legal Opinion

State v. Trivitt

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided June 24, 1977No. 10473PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

TITUS, Judge.

Tried under the habitual criminal statute (§ 556.280, V.A.M.S.), a jury found defendant guilty of the unlawful possession of phenmetrazine hydrochloride, a controlled substance listed in Schedule II of § 195.017, V.A.M.S. The court assessed punishment at ten years’ imprisonment and defendant appealed.

On the date in question, the night patrolman for Sarcoxie first encountered defendant at a closed Texaco service station, next saw him purchasing gasoline at an opened station and finally accosted defendant to admonish him against driving his station wagon in the nighttime through…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States v. PorterCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1971
  2. United States v. Charles SchrenzelCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1972
  3. State v. MontgomerySupreme Court of Missouri · 1949
  4. State v. TashMissouri Court of Appeals · 1975

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Trivitt v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API