State v. Tash
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
DIXON, Judge.
Defendant was convicted by a jury of stealing a dog. The jury failed to assess the punishment, and the trial court sentenced the defendant to two years.
Judgment and conviction are affirmed.
Defendant has raised twenty-seven points in his brief filed in this appeal. They are extremely repetitive and can be collected under twelve general headings for the purpose of review.
I
Since one of the categories of error claimed by the defendant is the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain the conviction, it will be necessary to state the facts which the jury could have found upon the evidence…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- State v. CuckovichSupreme Court of Missouri · 1972
- State v. SpicaSupreme Court of Missouri · 1965
- State v. SmithSupreme Court of Missouri · 1968
- State v. StevensSupreme Court of Missouri · 1971
- State v. HydeSupreme Court of Missouri · 1911
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- State v. PuckettMissouri Court of Appeals · 1980
- State v. TylerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1979
- State v. KoonceMissouri Court of Appeals · 1987
- Seltzer v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1985
- State v. HarlstonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1978
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.