Legal Opinion
In Re the Personal Restraint of Rolston
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided January 22, 1987No. 10216-1-IIPublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtReed, C.J.
Petitioner, Darrell E. Rolston, filed an appeal with this court seeking review of the trial court's decision setting petitioner's minimum term outside the presumptive range of the sentencing reform act. On review this court has determined that the court's decision is not appealable. However, it will be considered as a personal restraint petition.
Prior to July 1, 1986 the parole board set minimum terms of incarceration. RCW 9.95.040. Review of such parole board decisions was obtained by filing a personal restraint petition. RAP 16.3(a). Such decisions were not reviewable by appeal or by…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Addleman v. Board of Prison Terms and ParolesWashington Supreme Court · 1986
- State v. HarpCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1986
- Lindsey v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1949
3Cited by20 opinions
- Matter of Personal Restraint of LocklearWashington Supreme Court · 1992
- In Re the Personal Restraint of GeorgeCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1988
- State v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1989
- State v. ShephardCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1988
- Ben-Neth v. Indeterminate Sentence Review BoardCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1987
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.