Legal Opinion

South Carolina Electric & Gas Co. v. Utilities Construction Co.

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided March 26, 1964No. 18188PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Bussey, Justice.

In this action the plaintiff-respondent seeks to recover by way of indemnity, the sum of $39,000.00, interest and costs from the defendant-appellant. The controversy arose out of the following facts:

The Town of Holly Hill passed an ordinance which granted the plaintiff the electric franchise for that copimunity. The portions of this ordinance pertinent to this controversy read as follows:

“Section 3. The poles, towers, conduits, cables, conductors, transforming stations, fittings, appliances and appurtenances shall be so, constructed as not to unreasonably interfere with the…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. WhetstoneSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1963
  2. Jenkins v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1924
  3. Bell v. Clinton Oil MillSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1924
  4. Murray v. the Texas Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1934
  5. Ilderton v. Charleston Consol. Ry. Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1919

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. South Carolina State Ports Authority v. Booz-Allen & Hamilton, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1986
  2. Town of Winnsboro v. Wiedeman-Singleton, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1992
  3. Rogers v. South Carolina Department of Parole & Community CorrectionsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1995
  4. Stuck v. Pioneer Logging MacHinery, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1983
  5. Byerly Ex Rel. Estate of Byerly v. ConnorSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1992

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API