South Carolina Electric & Gas Co. v. Utilities Construction Co.
Supreme Court of South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
Bussey, Justice.
In this action the plaintiff-respondent seeks to recover by way of indemnity, the sum of $39,000.00, interest and costs from the defendant-appellant. The controversy arose out of the following facts:
The Town of Holly Hill passed an ordinance which granted the plaintiff the electric franchise for that copimunity. The portions of this ordinance pertinent to this controversy read as follows:
“Section 3. The poles, towers, conduits, cables, conductors, transforming stations, fittings, appliances and appurtenances shall be so, constructed as not to unreasonably interfere with the…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. WhetstoneSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1963
- Jenkins v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1924
- Bell v. Clinton Oil MillSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1924
- Murray v. the Texas Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1934
- Ilderton v. Charleston Consol. Ry. Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1919
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- South Carolina State Ports Authority v. Booz-Allen & Hamilton, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1986
- Town of Winnsboro v. Wiedeman-Singleton, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1992
- Rogers v. South Carolina Department of Parole & Community CorrectionsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1995
- Stuck v. Pioneer Logging MacHinery, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1983
- Byerly Ex Rel. Estate of Byerly v. ConnorSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1992
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.