Legal Opinion
Ariel Land Owners, Inc. v. Dring
District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
Decided January 28, 2003No. 4:01-cr-00294PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
CAPUTO, District Judge.
Before the Court is a motion by Defendants Lori Dring and Nancy Asaro to stay concurrent state court proceedings concerning this matter. (Doc. 57.) In opposition, Plaintiff Ariel Land Owners, Inc. contends that Defendants removed this case in violation of the one-year time limitation of 28 U.S.C. § 1446(b). Therefore, Plaintiff argues, the Court lacks subject matter jurisdiction over this case. (Doc. 61.) The Court agrees. I lack subject matter jurisdiction to hear this case because § 1446(b) applies to this case and because this one-year time limitation is a…
2Cases cited43 opinions
- Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- McNutt v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Saint Paul Mercury Indemnity Co. v. Red Cab Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Shamrock Oil & Gas Corp. v. SheetsSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Caterpillar Inc. v. LewisSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Aguayo v. AMCO InsuranceDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2014
- Ariel Land Owners, Inc. v. Lori Dring Nancy AsaroCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2003
- McDaniel v. LoyaDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2015
- Caudill v. Ford Motor Co.District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 2003
- Carrick v. Sears, Roebuck and Co.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2003
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.