Legal Opinion

Carrick v. Sears, Roebuck and Co.

District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania

Decided March 17, 2003No. 3:02-cv-02276PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

CAPUTO, District Judge.

Plaintiff Richard Carrick filed a complaint in the Court of Common Pleas of Lackawanna County on November 21, 2002 against Defendant Sears, Roebuck and Co. alleging various state law claims. 1 Defendant removed the action to federal court. (Doc. 1.) Defendant filed a motion to dismiss. (Doc. 2.) Plaintiff subsequently filed a motion for remand to state court. (Doc. 8.) The Court heard oral arguments on February 24, 2003. This matter has been fully briefed and is ripe for disposition. Because the Court finds that Defendant has not satisfied the…

2Cases cited46 opinions

  1. Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  2. Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  3. Caterpillar Inc. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. McNutt v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
  5. Saint Paul Mercury Indemnity Co. v. Red Cab Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Dunson v. McNeil-PPC, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2004
  2. BAILEY v. ULTA SALON, COSMETICS & FRAGRANCE, INC.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API