Legal Opinion

Schutte & Koerting, Inc. v. Regional Water Quality Control Board

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 20, 2007No. G048830PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

NARES, Acting P. J.

Respondent California Regional Water Quality Control Board (the Regional Board or Board) oversees the investigation and cleanup by appellants Schutte & Koerting, Inc. (hereafter sometimes referred to as S&K), and Ametek, Inc. (Ametek) (together, appellants), of a large toxic groundwater plume of metal cleaning solvents and other industrial wastes that leaked into the ground at an aerospace manufacturing facility that appellants once owned and operated. In July 2003 the Regional Board issued an investigative order (the HHRA order) under Water Code 1 section 13267,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Bixby v. PiernoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Fitch v. Select Products Co.California Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Kazensky v. City of MercedCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
  4. Tahoe Vista Concerned Citizens v. County of PlacerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
  5. Ghilotti Construction Co. v. City of RichmondCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Barclay Hollander Corp. v. Cal. Reg'l Water Quality Control Bd., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
  2. City of Hesperia v. Lake Arrowhead Cmty. Servs. Dist., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
  3. Dobos v. Voluntary Plan Administrators, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2008
  4. Anton's Services v. HagenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2025
  5. Barclay Hollander Corp. v. Cal. Regional Water Quality Control etc.California Court of Appeal · 2019

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API