City of Hesperia v. Lake Arrowhead Cmty. Servs. Dist.
California Court of Appeal, 5th District
1Opinion of the CourtIrion, J.
*739Over the years since at least 1959, the Legislature has attempted to achieve a balance between the state's interest in allowing local agencies to produce, generate, store, and transmit water or electrical energy and the cites' and counties' control over local building and zoning. This appeal requires the court to consider whether a solar energy project proposed by a local agency, the Lake Arrowhead Community Services District (District), is exempt from-or whether the District must comply with-the zoning ordinances of the city in which the project is to be developed, the City of Hesperia…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Topanga Assn. for a Scenic Comm. v. CTY OF LOS ANGELESCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- Vons Companies, Inc. v. Seabest Foods, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1996
- Hall v. City of TaftCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
- Union Iron Works v. Industrial Accident CommisionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
- Travis v. County of Santa CruzCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Anton's Services v. HagenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2025
- California Attorney General Opinion 24-1101, California Attorney General Reports2026
- City of Hesperia v. Lake Arrowhead Community Services Dist.California Court of Appeal · 2023
- Rodgers v. State Personnel BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2022
- Town of Apple Valley v. Apple Valley Ranchose WaterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2025
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.