Legal Opinion
Peter H. Beer v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided June 11, 2013No. 09-37CPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Compensation Clause of Article III; damages; prejudgment interest; deductions; Federal Employees’ Group Life Insurance Program; tax withholdings.
OPINION
BRUGGINK, Judge.
This is an action for back pay brought pursuant to Article III of the United States Constitution. The matter is pending on remand from the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. Beer v. United States, 696 F.3d 1174 (Fed.Cir.2012), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 133 S.Ct. 1997, 185 L.Ed.2d 866 (2013). After finding for the plaintiffs on liability, the Federal Circuit directed this court to determine, as damages, “the…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Ashwander v. Tennessee Valley AuthoritySupreme Court of the United States · 1936
- United States v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Citizens United v. Federal Election CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
- Sprague v. Ticonic National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Fisher v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- In re City of DetroitUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Michigan · 2013
- In re City of DetroitUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Michigan · 2013
- Thomas R. Cornish v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2013
- Linda Gerken v. Gary ShermanMissouri Court of Appeals · 2015
- Peggy Stevens McGraw and Samuel C. Jones, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated v. State of Missouri, Missouri State Employees' Retirement System, Missouri Commissioner of Administration Doug Nelson, and Missouri State Treasurer Clint ZweifelSupreme Court of Missouri · 2016