Legal Opinion

Pearson v. Hasty

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided May 11, 1943No. 30034PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GIBSON, V. C. J.

This is an action to recover an interest in real estate. Judgment was for defendants, and plaintiffs appeal.

Plaintiffs as pretermitted children claim title to an undivided two-thirds interest in the land as heirs of their father, who died in 1913 after devising all his estate to his widow. The will was admitted to probate and the estate distributed according to the terms thereof in 1915. In 1917 the widow conveyed the land to defendants’ ancestor.

At the time of the distribution aforesaid the plaintiffs were infants of the ages of four and three years, respectively. They charge…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Vance v. VanceSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
  2. Johnson v. WhelanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940
  3. Thomas v. MorganSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
  4. Goodman v. NicholsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1890
  5. Channell v. JonesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Head v. McCrackenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2004
  2. Moore v. HarjoCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1944
  3. Ward v. LindlySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1955
  4. Voegele v. MahoneySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1952
  5. Mitchell v. GrahamSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1943

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API