Legal Opinion

In re Anwer

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided February 27, 2014Published

1Opinion of the Court

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Ap*1115peal Board, filed August 20, 2012, which ruled that claimant was eligible to receive unemployment insurance benefits because she had sufficient weeks of covered employment to file a valid original claim.

From February 2011 until September 2011, claimant worked as a counter manager selling fragrances for Exclusive Fragrance & Cosmetics, Inc. (hereinafter EFC) at Saks Fifth Avenue in New York City. After he stopped working for this company, he applied for unemployment insurance benefits. The Department of Labor concluded that claimant’s base…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In re Concourse Ophthalmology Associates, P. C.New York Court of Appeals · 1983
  2. In re Ted Is Back Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1984
  3. In re the Claim of ZelenkaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
  4. In re the Claim of AskewAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API