Legal Opinion
In re the Claim of Askew
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided January 11, 2007PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLahtinen, J.
Appeals from two decisions of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed May 13, 2005, which ruled that Nars Cosmetics, Inc. was liable for unemployment insurance contributions based on remuneration paid to claimant and others similarly situated.
Claimant was hired by Nars Cosmetics, Inc. as a make-up artist to perform makeovers at various retail stores during events held to promote the latter’s line of cosmetics and brushes. When claimant ceased working for Nars, his application for unemployment insurance benefits was initially approved. It was also determined that other persons similarly…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- In re the Claim of O'TooleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- In re Fitness Plus, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- In re the Claim of BoothAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- In re the Claim of JarzabekAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- In re the Claim of VarrecchiaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
3Cited by5 opinions
- In Re Fedex Ground Package System, Inc., Employment Practices LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 2010
- In re AnwerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- In re AnwerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- In re the Claim of VictorAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- In re the Claim of VictorAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014